The Reablement Review (Reablement)

1. The Purpose and Requirements of Review in Reablement

The purpose of review

Review in reablement has a dual purpose to:

1. Review the reablement provision itself; and
2. Establish what the person's likely needs for Care and Support may (or may not) be when reablement ends.

The responsibility of review

It is your responsibility as the allocated social care practitioner at the reablement service to carry out the review of the reablement service being provided.

What the review must include

Regarding the reablement provision

1. A review of each outcome and progress made towards achieving it;
2. Whether there have been any issues with reablement that could not be resolved through monitoring;
3. Who has been involved in reablement and the role they have played (including family, friends and other services such as occupational therapy);
4. Whether reablement is still appropriate and needs to continue;
5. If reablement is to continue; whether any changes are needed to the reablement plan (e.g. outcomes) or service delivery (e.g. frequency/duration of visits or involvement of others) following the review;
6. Whether there are any changes needed to the monitoring arrangements; and
7. When the next review will be.

Regarding likely needs for Care and Support after reablement

1. Whether there have been any changes to the person's needs since assessment;
2. Whether the person is likely to have on-going needs for Care and Support following reablement;
3. If so, whether the person has an existing Care and Support Plan that is meeting needs;
4. If not, what action needs to be taken to ensure that eligible on-going needs for Care and Support are met when reablement ends.

2. Who to Involve in the Review

Who must be involved

Whenever you carry out a review of reablement you must involve:

1. The person receiving reablement;
2. Anyone else that the person has asked you to involve;
3. Any carer that the person has;
4. The person's representative (when they lack capacity or have substantial difficulty);
5. Where the person lacks capacity, anyone else that the Local Authority deems it would be in the person's best interests to involve.

Who may be involved

With the person's consent you should also involve:

1. Anyone who has been involved in providing reablement to the person (for example the reablement worker or any external reablement provider);
2. Anyone who has been involved in monitoring reablement (for example an occupational therapist or assistive technology); and
3. Any family or friends of the person.

Involving family and friends can increase the effectiveness and sustainability of reablement outcomes. Click here to access information about the benefits of doing so.

Where the person has not consented for a carer to be involved

Under the Care Act carers have to be a part of any review, even if the cared for person does not want them to be.  This is because the Local Authority needs to:

1. Make sure any plans remains relevant to the person's needs (and whether the support they are receiving is appropriate and sustainable); and
2. Identify and support carers.

When a person has not consented to the carer being a part of the review you should:

1. Advise the person that you have a duty to involve the carer;
2. Explain the benefits of the carer being involved; and
3. Agree the most appropriate way to involve the carer (for example a separate meeting with the carer).

If the person has requested particular information not relating to needs is withheld from the carer, and they have capacity to do so normal confidentiality rules apply unless doing so would put the person at risk of abuse or neglect.

3. Mental Capacity and Engagement Difficulties

Review when the person lacks capacity

Some people will lack capacity to understand or engage in the reablement review process (verbally or through another means). Where this is the case the duty to ensure their involvement still applies.

There are a range of ways that you can ensure the involvement of a person who lacks capacity, including but not limited to:

1. An appropriate other person or independent advocate to support the person to engage and ensure that they are represented;
2. Spending time with the person;
3. Consulting with a range of people who know the person;
4. Use other available evidence (for example ABC charts and other records).

All information gathering and sharing should be carried out with regard to the Caldicott Principles and local information sharing policies.

Use the tri.x Resources tab to access further information about the Caldicott Principles in the glossary.

Review when the person has substantial difficulty engaging

If a person does not lack capacity but does have substantial difficulty being involved in the review you must take all reasonable steps to ensure their involvement.

You must:

1. Ensure that you have provided information in an accessible way, or that the person has an appropriate person to support them to understand it;
2. Arrange to carry out the review in an appropriate format so that it is accessible. This is likely to be face to face, unless the person's difficulty arises when engaging in face to face communication;
3. Consider whether the person has an appropriate person to support their involvement and, if not, whether the advocacy duty applies.

4. When to Review Reablement

Review in reablement is primarily a planning mechanism and the optimum time to carry out a review is:

1. When reablement has been in place for a long enough period of time for its effectiveness to be reviewed;
2. When any equipment or assistive technology in place as part of reablement has been in situ long enough for its impact to be effectively reviewed; and
3. When it is possible to predict what the person's likely needs for Care and Support following reablement may (or may not) be.

A proposed review date should be agreed with the person (and any carer they have) as part of reablement planning and will normally be around 3 weeks from the start of reablement, although this should be flexible and a review may need to be held earlier than this when:

1. Monitoring identifies that reablement may no longer be appropriate; or
2. There are issues in the plan that have not been resolved through monitoring and are reducing the benefit of reablement; or
3. The person has achieved all of the reablement outcomes; or
4. The person, carer or anyone else has requested a review.

5. Deciding the Method of Review

The different methods of review available

The Care Act recognises a whole host of different methods of review, any of which could be appropriate so long as:

1. The person's involvement is maximised by the method;
2. The method is proportionate to the outcomes being met by the Reablement Plan; and
3. The method enables the review to be carried out as quickly as is reasonably practical.

Possible review methods include:

1. Face to face review;
2. Telephone review;
3. Online review;
4. Combined review (with a carer);
5. Joint or integrated review (with an occupational therapist or social worker).

Combining a review with a carers review

If the person receiving reablement has a carer who has a Support Plan it may be beneficial to carry out a combined review of the carers Support Plan when:

1. Changes to the carers Support Plan may be needed as a result of reablement; or
2. A scheduled review of the carer's Support Plan is imminent.

Where it would be beneficial to carry out a review of the carers Support Plan you should:

1. Offer the carer a review of their Support Plan; and
2. If accepted, carry out a carer's review (or arrange for a review to be carried out if this is not your role).

Where you will be carrying out a review of the carers Support Plan you should consider the benefit in carrying out a combined review process. Combined reviews can be carried out whenever:

1. It is deemed appropriate to do so (for example both parties involvement can still be maximised and there is no conflict between the parties);
2. Both the person and the carer agree to a combined review process; or
3. The person with Care and Support needs lacks capacity to agree but a best interest decision is made to carry out a combined review; and
4. Both parties consent to sharing information with each other for the purpose of combined review; or
5. The person with Care and Support needs lacks capacity to consent but a best interest decision is made to that effect.

Click here to access the procedures for carrying out a carer's review, which you should use to enhance these procedures when assessing the needs of a carer during any combined review process.

How to decide the method of review

When making a decision about the method of review you must have regard to:

1. The wishes and preferences of the person;
2. The views of any carer;
3. The likely outcome of the review (based on information gathered through monitoring); and
4. The complexity of the outcomes being met by the Reablement Plan.

Some of the other factors that should be considered include:

1. Availability of a particular review method;
2. If the person has a carer, whether carrying out a combined review process would be beneficial.
3. Whether there is a concern about the person's capacity in relation to a particular decision to be made. In this situation the Care Act requires you must carry out a face to face review;
4. Whether the method of review chosen poses any challenges or risks for the person;
5. The specific communication needs of the person (specifically whether they will be able to engage in the review method);
6. The potential fluctuation of the persons needs or situation; and
7. Any need for multidisciplinary working or review.

The method of review when the person lacks capacity

6. Joint Review

When other services are being provided

If the person is receiving any kind of support from another service that is also subject to review you should consider the benefit in carrying out a joint review. This is particularly the case when that service:

1. Has been integral to reablement (for example an occupational therapy or assistive technology); or
2. Will have an active role in meeting likely on-going needs after reablement ends (for example an allocated social worker).

Carrying out a joint review will:

1. Reduce duplication for the person; and
2. Ensure that changes to reablement following review are disseminated and implemented quickly to everyone involved.

Any decision to request joint work should be made with the person (or their representative). Where the person is unable to provide consent to joint work decisions should be made in their best interests.

The process of requesting joint work during reablement should be as simple as possible to allow for a swift response.

You should familiarise yourself with the process for requesting joint work as part of a reablement service, as this is likely to be different to the process of making a general referral to the required service.

The duty to co-operate

Where the Local Authority requests another party to work jointly in some way to benefit the person with Care and Support needs that party has a duty to co-operate with the request (unless by doing so they will be prevented from carrying out their own duties under the Care Act or other legislation).

7. Preparing for the Review

Gathering, understanding and using available information

Before continuing or beginning to carry out any kind of review you should take some time to read through the information that is already available for the purposes of:

1. Understanding it; and
2. Thinking about how it should inform the review process.

Particular emphasis should be given to:

1. The information and evidence gathered through monitoring; and
2. Any information gathered from the person and any carer.

It is also appropriate to consult with other to gather information prior to review with the person's consent (or in their best interests if they lack capacity).

Click here to access the procedures for gathering information and consulting with others if further guidance is required.

All information gathering and sharing should be carried out with regard to the Caldicott Principles and local information sharing policies.

Use the tri.x Resources tab to access further information about the Caldicott Principles in the glossary.

Arranging the review

Legally you must have regard to the following when arranging a review:

1. The person's views and wishes about when and how the review is carried out, including who they would like to support them;
2. The impact of any delay in review on their individual Wellbeing; and
3. Whether any information and advice can be given to them that will prevent, delay or reduce the need for Care and Support.

The most important thing you must consider when arranging the review is how you will ensure the involvement of the person. Some of the things you should think about include:

1. Whether the person will require independent advocacy;
2. Whether the person will find any review process to be emotionally difficult and what can be done to reduce their anxiety;
3. The information the person (and any carer) may need to prepare for the review;
4. Whether the person requires any support with communication;
5. Whether the person would like for anyone in particular to be involved in any review;
6. Which environment would be best to meet in (if a meeting is to be arranged); and
7. Whether the review needs to consider any physical needs the person has for medication, rest or personal care.

When arranging the review you should also identify other people who may need to be a part of it. For example, a health professional or a service provider may need to be involved.

If the person lacks capacity

If the person lacks capacity you should make arrangements with an appropriate person. Where available this should be a person legally authorised to represent them (for example a Court appointed Deputy or a Lasting Power of Attorney) or an independent advocate.

Preparing the person

Under the Care Act you must provide information about the review process to the person (or their representative if they lack capacity) as early as possible. This will help ensure their involvement in the review and any subsequent Care and Support processes. Wherever practical this should be provided before the review process begins.

Any information should be provided in an accessible way for the person who will be receiving it. In all cases where information has been provided by telephone a follow up letter confirming the information provided should be sent to the person.

The information that should be provided is as follows:

1. Information about what can be expected during the review process;
2. The purpose of the review process;
3. The format that the review will take (e.g. telephone review, face-to-face review);
4. The indicative timeframe for review (when will it begin and how long is it likely to take);
5. Possible outcomes of the review;
6. The complaints process; and
7. Information about possible access to independent advocacy.

If you intend to ask specific questions during the review you should provide these questions to the person to support them to prepare.

Information about finances

You must inform the person (or their representative if they lack capacity) that, subject to a financial assessment they may need to make a contribution following the review if:

1. Reablement is extended past the 6 week non-chargeable period; or
2. Care and Support is provided to them to meet on-going needs.

Financial assessment is often a key point of anxiety for people and it is important that you are able to provide good information and advice (either directly or by supporting the person to access it from an appropriate person or source).

For further detail about specific information about financial assessment that must be given under the Care Act click here.

Click here to see the answers to some frequently asked questions around financial assessment.

Click here to access the financial assessment procedures, including how and when to provide information and advice about financial assessment, how and when to request a financial assessment and what to do if a person refuses a financial assessment.

Preparing others

It is important that everyone who is to be involved in a review is aware of:

1. The purpose of the review;
2. The process of review; and
3. Their role in any review.

The needs of others involved in a review should also be considered, but this should not be at the detriment of maximising the person's own involvement.

8. The Review Conversation (Reviewing Reablement)

Reviewing reablement outcomes

The conversation about reablement outcomes must broadly establish whether:

1. The outcomes in the Reablement Plan have been achieved or not;
2. The person has any new outcomes they want to meet; and
3. Any improvements are required to the plan to achieve better outcomes.

Simple questions should be used to confirm that outcomes are being met by the Reablement Plan, such as:

1. How have you been able to work towards the outcomes in your plan?
2. Have there been any changes to the things that are important to you to achieve, change or maintain?
3. Do you think there needs to be any changes to the plan to support you work towards your outcomes?

You should refer to the Reablement Plan to confirm what the person's outcomes were if this requires clarification.

Action when reablement outcomes have not been progressed as intended

If outcomes have not been achieved (or progressed) as intended by reablement you must take steps to:

1. Establish if the outcomes are still important to the person;
2. Establish that the outcomes are still realistic based upon the person's strengths and abilities;
3. Establish whether outcomes have not been achieved because the person has not been able to 'carry over' learning (which is an indicator that reablement may not be appropriate);
4. Agree any changes to the outcomes (for example whether the outcome itself needs to change or be broken down into smaller goals).

Where required you should refer to the procedure for agreeing reablement outcomes which can be accessed by clicking here.

Talking about general outcomes

When arranging reablement consideration should have been given to how the service may be able to support the person to meet the general outcomes that they identified in the assessment.

During the reablement review it is important to establish:

1. Whether the service has supported the person to work towards their general outcomes as intended; and
2. If there is anything else the service can do to support the person to work towards their general outcomes.

You should refer to the assessment (or Care and Support Plan if the person has one) to confirm what the person's general outcomes were if this requires clarification.

Talking about individual Wellbeing

You have a statutory duty to promote individual Wellbeing at all times, including at review. Conversations about Wellbeing need to be proportionate and appropriate, having regard for whether Wellbeing is likely to have changed.

Click here to access the procedure for talking about Wellbeing.

Talking about what is working and not working

The conversation about what is working and not working must broadly establish whether:

1. The frequency, duration and timeliness of reablement is being provided as set out in the Reablement Plan (or as agreed through monitoring);
2. The Reablement Plan is, on the whole supporting the person to achieve outcomes;
3. Anything is having a detrimental impact on the reablement;
4. There are any risks to the plan or to reablement;
5. Everybody involved in reablement is satisfied with how it is progressing.

Simple questions should be used to confirm that reablement is working, such as:

1. Is everything in the Reablement Plan in place as intended?
2. Is reablement working well for you?
3. Does anything need to change about the plan or the way you are supported?

You should refer to the Reablement Plan to confirm current arrangements for providing reablement and outcomes if this requires clarification.

If the conversation about what is working/not working identifies issues you will need to manage these to reduce the risk of:

1. Reablement breaking down; or
2. Reablement not achieving optimum levels of independence.

Click here to access the procedure for managing issues with the plan.

Talking about risk

It is important to talk about risk during review for the purpose of establishing that:

1. Risks continue to be well managed;
2. There have been no changes to risk;
3. There is no risk to the person from abuse or neglect; and
4. There is no risk to the Reablement Plan's stability or sustainability.

Simple questions should be used, such as:

1. Do you feel safe?
2. Is there a chance that reablement could stop working well?

You should refer to the Reablement Plan to confirm risks and strategies in place to manage risks if this requires clarification.

The conversation about risk may identify:

1. Additional information and advice that you can provide to support the person to manage risk. Where this is the case you must provide such information and advice;
2. Small changes required to the Reablement Plan to manage risk;
3. The need to involve another service (for example occupational therapy or assistive technology);
4. The need to raise a safeguarding concern.

9. The Review Conversation (Establishing Likely On-Going Needs)

The duty to assess and determine eligibility

Under the Care Act the Local Authority has a duty to:

1. Establish which needs a person has are eligible for Care and Support; and
2. Provide the person with a personal budget to meet any eligible needs.

If you know that a person is likely to have on-going needs for Care and Support you must take necessary steps to ensure that this duty is met.

Why establishing likely on-going needs in a timely way is important

It is important that likely on-going needs are established in a timely way so that:

1. Any assessment, review or reassessment of need can take place before reablement has ended in a planned way (rather than in an urgent way);
2. Eligibility can be determined before reablement has ended;
3. If needs are eligible, Care and Support planning can take place in a considered way, ensuring that needs are met in the most appropriate and proportionate way; and
4. An appropriate handover can take place between the reablement service and any subsequent provider.

If likely needs are not established in a timely way:

1. The person may experience a period where needs that are likely to be eligible are unmet (which is not lawful); or
2. Planning and exploring the most appropriate and proportionate way to meet on-going needs may be rushed; or
3. The reablement service could be faced with no alternative but to meet urgent needs in the interim (which will impact on the services capacity to support others).

Establishing any change in needs since assessment

Making effective use of the information gathered during assessment you should establish:

1. Whether there have been any changes in the person's needs throughout the course of reablement; and
2. Where there have been changes broadly what those changes are.

A simple question, such as 'Has there been any change to your needs' can be sufficient to determine any need to explore needs further.

You should refer to the assessment report to confirm what assessed needs were if this requires clarification.

Exploring and managing different views about need

If, as part of the review there is disagreement about whether a person's needs have changed it is your responsibility to make the final decision about whether needs have changed. To do this you should:

1. Consider all of the available evidence;
2. Give regard to the views of the person; and
3. Consider the different views expressed by others.

You must make sure that the evidence upon which you base your decision is robust and you must be open about the evidence that you have used.

Short term changes in need

If a person has experienced a change in need but this is only likely to be short term an assessment/reassessment of need may not be required, as long as:

1. The needs can be met and are being met by the existing Care and Support Plan; and
2. It is reasonable to believe that the needs are short term only.

You will need to agree appropriate arrangements to monitor the person's needs and circumstances throughout the remaining course of reablement. You will also need to ensure that the person (or their representative if they lack capacity) knows what action to take should the short term needs become more long term or the Care and Support Plan no longer meets the needs.

If the person has no likely need for on-going Care and Support

If the person has no likely need for on-going Care and Support click here to access the procedure for planning to end reablement (no on-going need).

If the person has a likely need for Care and Support

If the person has a likely need for Care and Support you must establish whether or not an existing Care and Support Plan is already meeting that need. If an existing Care and Support Plan is not in place and meeting the need you must explain to the person (or their representative):

1. That further assessment may be required to confirm needs (but that this will be proportionate and make use of the information already available);
2. That eligibility criteria will need to be applied to determine whether their likely needs are eligible needs under the Care Act;
3. Where needs are eligible, if the person wants the Local Authority to meet those needs a Care and Support Plan will need to be developed; and
4. That they may have to make a financial contribution to the cost of any services provided, subject to a financial assessment process.

Click here to access the procedure for planning to end reablement (likely on-going need).

Talking about ways to meet on-going needs

It is reasonable for a person with likely on-going needs to want to start thinking about how a likely need could be met when:

1. A likely need has been identified; and
2. The likely need is not already being met through an existing Care and Support Plan.

However, you should be mindful that at this stage the likely need has not been determined eligible. As such conversations about how to meet the likely need should be restricted to:

1. Ways that the person could meet their needs (either independently or with the support of their informal support networks or community);
2. Information and advice about other prevention services that could delay, reduce of prevent needs; and
3. Broad information about the type of services available in the marketplace that may be appropriate to meet needs (if the person appears to have eligible needs).

A more specific conversation about how the Local Authority could meet needs will take place as part of the Care and Support Planning process after:

1. The formal eligibility determination is made; and
2. The person has confirmed that they wish for the Local Authority to meet their needs.

10. Making a Record of the Conversation

During the conversation

It is quite appropriate to take notes during a skilled conversation to ensure that you are able to satisfactorily recall and capture what has been discussed and agreed in the formal record. However, there are some general good practice rules to follow when doing so:

1. Think beforehand about the level of note-taking that may be required-ensure you have to right tools and that they are proportionate;
2. Explain to the person and anyone else present that you will be taking some notes and why;
3. Reassure the person and anyone else present that you will still be listening to them even when you are making notes;
4. Don't record everything that is said. This will prevent you from engaging in the conversation and cause distraction-you need to pick out what is relevant and important;
5. Make sure you record everything that the person says is important to them, even if it does not appear to be relevant to you or others;
6. If the person uses a certain phrase that is powerful or indicative to the context you should record this word for word;
7. Sometimes information is detailed or complex and taking notes could take a little longer than expected. If this is the case you should consider making a polite request for a brief pause to allow for notes to be made;
8. Sometimes people provide a lot of information without a pause-perhaps they are anxious or simply have a lot to say. Trying to keep up can lead to you over-recording (recording everything regardless of relevance); missing key points, failing to understand what is being said or appearing disengaged from the conversation. If this is the case you should consider politely requesting a pause to allow for clarity and notes to be made;
9. Refer to your notes to summarise what has been said during the conversation, reflect and seek clarity about what has been agreed and next steps;
10. Try to make notes in a legible way and take care to use appropriate language-the person may request to see the notes or be provided with a copy;
11. Confidentiality must be maintained at all times. Make sure that the notes are kept securely and only available to people authorised to see them;
12. Always file or dispose of any notes securely when a formal record of the conversation has been made.

After the conversation